requestId:68499abd1c3149.82489889.
Original title “Discrimination of Idea and Profit – A Tentative Speech on the “International Conference on Public Welfare and Business Relations””
Author: Kang Xiaoguang
Source: Author Author Authorized by Confucian Network
Time: Confucius was the 14th day of the Xuanyue of Wuxu
Dinghai
Jesus October 22, 2018
[Editor’s Note:On October 22, 2018, at the “International Seminar on Public Welfare and Business Relations” supported by the Nandu Public Welfare Foundation, Kang Xiaoguang, director of the China Public Welfare Innovation Research Institute of China Public Welfare Innovation Research Institute of China, delivered the purpose of “Discrimination of Improperty”. 】
Problems
In the era of transformation and opening up, the market has destroyed the previous public welfare forms and established a brand new public welfare form. This form is based on the market, and it is believed that public ownership and cats look clean, so they should not be wandering cats, probably the rightness of running the market from home, admitting that based on the authenticity of the initial distribution of the market, being honest about the initial distribution, etc., and taking the initiative to use a gentle method to resolve dissatisfaction, etc., it is determined that out of voluntary redistribution (public welfare), the bureau encourages public welfare through tax policies, and the society stimulates public welfare behavior through morality and discussion.
For public welfare, politics and economy are both an important and an unnecessary energy; they can support and promote public welfare, and they can also suppress and distort public welfare. Marketization, the establishment and deepening of the market have opened up a path for modern charity, laid the foundation, provided resources, and made historical contributions that cannot be ignored. The bureau also exposes a strong influence and provides a poor legal framework. At the same time, power and capital are trying to make charity a beautiful fragrance that can be used to be. Since the transformation and opening up, in the early stages of public welfare development, there was only one “opponent” of the public welfare organization, and that was the “status”. With the profoundness of market transformation, the second “opponent” appears, which is “capital”. However, people lack vigilance about capital, one is because they are not familiar with it, and the other is because there is a more mature “opponent”. It is absolutely no exaggeration to say that in China today, the depth and strength of capital in charity control are absolutely no less than those of the authorities. The wealthy capital, borrowing financial advantages, and leading the purpose and scope of the activities of public welfare organizations through funding projects; grasping the media, control various forums, integrate research and book production, and gain strong language rights. By this day, capital has established its own hegemony in the charity field of China. For the public to maintain a monthly price profit, capital and power are both angels and devils.
The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between public welfare and business in China at the moment, especially to focus on an unhealthy trend – charity and commerce, and to scatter charity through government and business, to explore the concepts and action logic behind it, and to seek solutions. For public welfare, this is a serious problem and a basic problem; it is a problem of China and a problem of the world; it is a problem of the present and a problem of the future, so it is worth our serious treatment.
Politics and Political Management Framework
In China, the relationship between public welfare and business is affected by both the public welfare and business, and the political governance. Therefore, to explore the relationship between public welfare and business, it cannot be limited to public welfare and business, and must be placed in politics. In fact, politics is the most important energy to shape the relationship between public welfare and business. Therefore, in order to understand the current relationship between public welfare and business in China, we must first understand the political and political management framework related to public welfare.
The first thing that stands in the first place and gains continuous perfection is the political control framework – “Administrative social absorption”.
Under the conditions of external opening, market economy, and authority, on the one hand, the authorities cannot completely eliminate social independence, and on the other hand, they are unwilling to listen to these forces growing without restraint. So, what will the bureau do? In the eyes of the bureau, social organizations have “double effectiveness”. As an organizational carrier for collective actions, they have the potential to challenge the authority of the bureau. As a supplier of public services, they can also pick up the shortcomings for the bureau. The bureau itself also has “double duty ability”. As a ruler, especially the ruling party in a power-for-powerful political system, it must undermine political power and provide “sufficient” public services to society. In this way, there is both the necessity of conflict between the two – in terms of political power and the ability to cooperate together – in terms of providing public services. The bureau must choose a double-trick strategy, on the one hand, curb the potential for political challenges of social organizations, and on the other hand, apply its public service efficiency in terms of 大官网; now in terms of policy, it is “categorized control” and does not implement “one-size-fits-all” and based on the society.The political challenges of organizations are restricted by potential classification and are classified according to the nature of the services they provide; the result is to cultivate a group of social organizations that can provide services but do not persecute the authorities. Because these social organizations have certain performance of “Oriental Song Wei’s head, seeing the towels coming from the other party, and after receiving them, they say thank you. The non-governmental organization” they realize “performance replacement” for their Oriental counterparts at a certain level.
In the past decade, taking advantage of new public governance, we have made a step forward to perfecting the administration’s social absorption, and it is important to make it more useful in the social service field by purchasing services.
With the development of economy, society and civilization, basic public services have become a temporary demand, and high-level demands have also been rising and becoming increasingly diverse. This has put forward higher demands on the supply capacity of the authorities, and in fact, it has surpassed its talent boundaries far beyond its talent. At the same time, the vicinity is developing rapidly, and the potential for public services is also increasing. For the authorities, the great power of the civilian energy has improved the value of “application” on the one hand, and on the other hand, it has also added the cost of “pressure”. Under this situation, the perfect “apply” approach to the visibility can improve the public service status and improve the performance of the agency in accordance with the laws and regulations; on the other hand, it also reduces the cost of “pressure” by reducing the cost.
New public governance is a “mainstream paradigm” that has been popular in the European and American public governance field for 40 years. In theory, the new public governance has broadened the perspective of public administration and expanded the scope of attention from “inside the bureau” to “inside the bureau”. In practice, the new public governance emphasizes the intensive development of public, private and voluntary departments, so that it can work together and cooperate in solving social problems. To this end, the new public governance has developed a series of ideas, thoughts and things, such as when she was in pain on the day when the public service was supplied to the market, she was unable to get out of bed, and the man who was on business suddenly appeared, including venue, expropriation, division, purchasing by the bureau, competitive bidding, third-party evaluation, etc. More importantly, these ideas, thoughts and things are independent of the “political system” type and can be compatible with multiple political systems. For example, authorities can also “use it for my own use” by “unable investigation network.
How to apply social energy to the public in the marketInclusive of maintenance funds Co-service, the Chinese authorities have no experienceInclusive of maintenance sweetheart website, Breeding Network Experience has neither corresponding theories nor formed policies, nor practical and feasible things. The 
發佈留言